BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//EuroSEAS 2021//EN
X-WR-CALNAME:EuroSEAS 2021
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Prague
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Prague
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
DTSTART:19700329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
DTSTART:19701025T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20240425T231000
UID:euroseas-2021-making-and-un-making-resource-frontiers-in-southeast-asia-state-formation-and-the-commodification-of-nature-1
SUMMARY:(P36AB) Making and Un-making Resource Frontiers in Southeast Asia: State Formation and the Commodification of Nature (1)
LOCATION:K12 | 2.03
DESCRIPTION:The hinterlands and uplands of Southeast Asia have been repeate
 dly imagined, described and analysed as a frontier. Their alleged untamed w
 ilderness and natural riches have been a powerful trope that served to legi
 timate population transfers, resource extraction, and the expansion of stat
 e control into remote regions, which are inhabited by local groups and wher
 e different land tenure rights overlap, producing questions over legitimate
  access to land and natural resources. Drawing on recent dynamic and proces
 sual understandings of frontiers (e.g. Geiger 2008, Acciaioli and Sabharwal
  2017, Cons and Eilenberg 2019), this panel explores processes of frontieri
 zation and de-frontierization, highlighting the complex interplay between t
 he commodification of nature and state formation. Recently, Kelly and Pelus
 o (2015) have argued that the production of natural resources is closely li
 nked to local processes of state formation and that the forms of resource c
 ontrol\nand property arrangements are constitutive of state authority. At t
 he same time, they are important drivers of frontierization and de-frontier
 ization. Formal property rights for example form a basic prerequisite for t
 oday’s large-scale land acquisitions, pushing processes of frontierization,
  while the recognition of customary rights in the state legislation, may pr
 oduce overlapping or competing rights to land or may lead to de-frontieriza
 tion.\n\nThe panel wishes to emphasize the fluidity, complexity, and tempor
 al dynamics of state formation in frontier areas, where competition over re
 sources and land is high, the presence of the state is fragmented and uneve
 n, and new property systems and legal arrangements are in the making. In or
 der to develop a comparative perspective on such frontier dynamics, we invi
 te contributions from different resource frontiers throughout Southeast Asi
 a that explore how processes of resource-making are interrelated with state
  making projects, how particular state initiatives enable specific processe
 s of frontierization and de-frontierization, and how the people who live in
  places framed as frontiers, exercise agency in these processes.
URL:https://euroseas2021.org/panels/making-and-un-making-resource-frontiers-in-southeast-asia-state-formation-and-the-commodification-of-nature
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20210909T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20210909T103000
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20240425T231000
UID:euroseas-2021-making-and-un-making-resource-frontiers-in-southeast-asia-state-formation-and-the-commodification-of-nature-2
SUMMARY:(P36AB) Making and Un-making Resource Frontiers in Southeast Asia: State Formation and the Commodification of Nature (2)
LOCATION:K12 | 2.03
DESCRIPTION:The hinterlands and uplands of Southeast Asia have been repeate
 dly imagined, described and analysed as a frontier. Their alleged untamed w
 ilderness and natural riches have been a powerful trope that served to legi
 timate population transfers, resource extraction, and the expansion of stat
 e control into remote regions, which are inhabited by local groups and wher
 e different land tenure rights overlap, producing questions over legitimate
  access to land and natural resources. Drawing on recent dynamic and proces
 sual understandings of frontiers (e.g. Geiger 2008, Acciaioli and Sabharwal
  2017, Cons and Eilenberg 2019), this panel explores processes of frontieri
 zation and de-frontierization, highlighting the complex interplay between t
 he commodification of nature and state formation. Recently, Kelly and Pelus
 o (2015) have argued that the production of natural resources is closely li
 nked to local processes of state formation and that the forms of resource c
 ontrol\nand property arrangements are constitutive of state authority. At t
 he same time, they are important drivers of frontierization and de-frontier
 ization. Formal property rights for example form a basic prerequisite for t
 oday’s large-scale land acquisitions, pushing processes of frontierization,
  while the recognition of customary rights in the state legislation, may pr
 oduce overlapping or competing rights to land or may lead to de-frontieriza
 tion.\n\nThe panel wishes to emphasize the fluidity, complexity, and tempor
 al dynamics of state formation in frontier areas, where competition over re
 sources and land is high, the presence of the state is fragmented and uneve
 n, and new property systems and legal arrangements are in the making. In or
 der to develop a comparative perspective on such frontier dynamics, we invi
 te contributions from different resource frontiers throughout Southeast Asi
 a that explore how processes of resource-making are interrelated with state
  making projects, how particular state initiatives enable specific processe
 s of frontierization and de-frontierization, and how the people who live in
  places framed as frontiers, exercise agency in these processes.
URL:https://euroseas2021.org/panels/making-and-un-making-resource-frontiers-in-southeast-asia-state-formation-and-the-commodification-of-nature
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20210909T110000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20210909T123000
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR